Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other EssaysLudwig von Mises Institute, 2000 - 321 pages |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, and Other Essays Murray Newton Rothbard Aucun aperçu disponible - 1974 |
Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, and Other Essays Murray Newton Rothbard,Murray N. Rothbard Aucun aperçu disponible - 2000 |
Expressions et termes fréquents
achieve aggression Albert Jay Nock American anarchist anarcho-communism become capitalism century child coercive communism communist conservatism Conservative consumers course defense division of labor economic economists egalitarian envy equality ernment essay ethical example exchange existing fact force free market freedom Georgists goal Harrison Bergeron hence human ideal ideological imperialism individual industrial inequality intellectual Jones justice in property land Left liberation libertarian liberty living long-run Ludwig von Mises Lysander Spooner market economy Marx mass means ment Mises's modern monopoly moral movement Murray N nature Nock nomic oppressed ownership paradigm parents person philosophy political primitive private property problem property rights property titles public sector quotal radical Randolph Bourne revolution Romantic Rothbard rule rulers Ruritanian self-ownership short simply Smith social socialist society Spooner State’s statism supposed theory of justice tion University utilitarian violence women York
Fréquemment cités
Page 95 - Though the earth and all inferior creatures be common to all men, yet every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has any right to but himself. The labour of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his.
Page 256 - ... in communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow...
Page 100 - Thus, the grass my horse has bit, the turfs my servant has cut, and the ore I have digged in any place, where I have a right to them in common with others, become my property without the assignation or consent of any body. The labour that was mine, removing them out of that common state they were in, hath fixed my property in them.
Page 176 - The great question of the seventies is, shall we surrender to our surroundings, or shall we make our peace with nature and begin to make reparations for the damage we have done to our air, to our land and to our water?
Page 100 - That labour put a distinction between them and common. That added something to them more than nature, the common mother of all, had done; and so they became his private right.
Page 100 - No body can deny but the nourishment is his. I ask then, when did they begin to be his? When he digested? Or when he eat?
Page 1 - Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back.
Page 95 - The labour of his body and the work of his hands we may say are properly his. Whatsoever, then, he removes out of the state that Nature hath provided and left it in, he hath mixed his labour with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property.
Page 255 - ... after the productive forces have also increased with the allround development of the individual, and all the springs of cooperative wealth flow more abundantly...
Page 288 - The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 2iith, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.