Politics in the Middle East
Oxford University Press, 1992 - 366 pages
Events in the Middle East have prompted many questions concerning the conflict between Islam and the European states which have, historically, been seen as a military and political challenge. Why has ideological politics triumphed in the Middle East? Why have attempts to form constitutional governments repeatedly failed in Islamic states? This new and authoritative account provides the historical analysis necessary for a clearer understanding of these questions. In the nineteenth century Middle Eastern leaders believed that they could surmount the challenge posed by the European Great Powers' by borrowing European weapons and technology, along with military and administrative organization, and, later, by adopting representative forms of government. These strategies proved a disappointment. The aftermath has been the establishment of military regimes, and an ideological style of politics, whether the ideology is nationalism or fundamentalism. This book describes and discusses the apparent success of ideological politics, and analyses its character.
Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.
Threat and Predicament
The Failure of Constitutionalism?
3 autres sections non affichées
able action activities administration affairs Anatolia appointed Arab armed army Assembly attempt authority became become believed British caliphate called century civil commander communities considered Constitution continued Council coup d'état course demands Democrats divines economic effect Egypt Egyptian elections Empire established European favour figures forces foreign formed French hands head ideas increased independence influence institutions interests Iraq Islam issue July Kemal Kurds land later leaders Lebanese Lebanon majority March Maronite means Middle military Muslim Mustafa Nasser National nationalist officers organized Ottoman Parliament Party Persia political population position President Prime Minister prominent proved reform regime religion religious remained representative Republic responsible rule ruler seen Shah Shiite social society subjects success Sultan Sunni Syria tion took traditional Turkey Turkish Turks various Western Young Zaghlul