Images de page
PDF
ePub

A Dialogue between Dr. Johnson and Dr. Goldfmith in the Shades,

30

[blocks in formation]

Lord Mountmorres's Impartial Reflections on equalizing the Duties

between Great Britain and Ireland,

Manufactures improper Subjects of Taxation,
ibid.

The Crifis; or, immediate Concerns of the British Empire, 3га
Eironiclaftes; or a Cloud of Facts against a Gleam of Comfort, ib.
Danger of violent Innovations in the State exemplified, in a Ser-
mon preached by George Berkeley, D. L. at Canterbury, Jan.

ibid.

ibid.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Captain Oakes's Narrative of the Treatment of the English by Tip

319,400

Abercrombie's Propagation and Botanical Arrangements of Plants

[blocks in formation]

ibid.

Defence of the Oppofition with refpect to their Conduct on Inth'
Affairs,

ibid.

[blocks in formation]

Sonnets and Poems; with a Verfification of the Six Bards of Offian,

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

mons,

The Reporter; or the Subftance of the Debate in Houfe of Com-

ibid.

Dawes's Deformity of the Doctrine of Libels, &c.

ibid.

Humphries's Poem addressed to the Armies of the United States of

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]

Obfervations on the Animal Oeconomy, and on the Caufes and Cure of Difeafes. By John Gardiner, M. D. Prefident of the Royal College of Phyficians, and Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 8vo. 6s. Longman."

A

Uthors have different objects in view, when they publish either their fentiments or obfervations. The young are im⚫pelled by a defire of fame; the elder are pleased with affuming the oracular dignity, and claiming the attention due to age, rank, or character. The diffident, in a modeft form, propofe their doubts and difficulties, in hopes of inftruction; the vain and the confident to filence impertinent pretenders, by a display of their own amazing acquifitions. But thefe, and the va rious other caufes which are either flightly hinted at, or oftentatiously explained, by different writers, feem to have had little effect on our author, whofe rank, as prefident of a refpectable college, leads us to form confiderable expectations. The little novelty in fome parts of his work, the obfcure and imperfect explanations in others, are neither confiftent with the ufual ambition of an author, nor worthy of Dr. Gardiner's character and fituation. If he thinks his obfervations generally new, we lament the limited extent of his knowlege; if he has aimed at rendering them highly ufeful, we regret his disappointment. In his preface, the president seems to think, that one caufe of the flow progrefs of knowlege arifes from a luxuriancy of fancy, and a liveliness of imagination, which induces authors to build fyftems on fuperficial and unftable foundations.' Indeed, from various expreffions, misleading the inexperienced ftudent,' acute, but falfe manner of reafoning," theoretical difquifitions of novelty and ingenuity,' he feems to aim his fhafts at the prefent profeffor of the practice of phyfic. Is it not otherwife ftrange that, in difcuffions on the living principle, and in condemning the conduct of former nofologifts, he thould not have once mentioned Dr. Cullen, except as the author of Vot. LIX. Jan. 1785. Tome

[ocr errors]

B

some experiments on the cold produced by evaporation? It is much more fo, if it be found that he had scarcely considered the profeffor's works on thefe fubjects. His theory of fevers, and his remarks on the arrangement of the bilious remittents, are striking proofs of Dr. Gardiner's inattention, either to the First Lines, or the Synopfis Nofologiæ. But it is not our business to afcertain the refpective property of each author: we must give an account of the contents, and our opinion of the execution of the work before us; but, as we fhall have occasion to mention our author's mistakes, we could not avoid this inftance of his want of candour.

[ocr errors]

Dr. Gardiner introduces this volume with fome remarks on

the vital principle, and the organs by which it is conveyed. In the relation of facts, he is generally exact; but his reasoning is generally defective; and through the whole, the liv ing principle, the principle of life, and life itself, are fo frequently confounded, that the plaineft fubject is obfcured.

From the living principle,' he tells us, in one paffage, diffufed through the folids and fluids, that principle of life, which is coeval with the animalcula in femine, arifes. But, though as many exceptions may be made to this fentence as it contains words, yet, in another place our author tells us, that the action of the heart is the firft vital motion; and that heat, which is infeparable from animal life, is not found in an egg, previous to incubation, or foon loft. In this part, we have not observed a fingle new fact, or any remark, which we can tranfcribe, with a view either to the entertainment or advantage of the reader. The obfervations on Dr. Crawford's Theory of Animal Heat have been again and again printed; and our author's own fyftem is fo imperfect, as fcarcely to deferve the name. In fact, it confifts chiefly of fome of the circumftances which influence the heat of animals, and refers the whole to the living principle. The intelligent reader will recollect various authors, who have already made equal advances; and, in most of them, he will find the feveral facts more perfectly and advantageously detailed.

Dr. Gardiner's language is rendered very obfcure by the frequent ufe of the term ftimulus. We understand the word when applied to food, heat, aromatics, and fome kind of medicine; but, when applied to opium, and to cold, we expected a nice diftinction, and began to apprehend a poison concealed under the apparently wholefome aliment; to fear, from this enemy to theoretical difquifions, of novelty and ingenuity, fomething which refembled a direct and an indirect ftimulus. But, after wandering in uncertainty, without the fmallet glimmering of a meaning, through two-thirds of his nervous physiology, we find that ftimulus is only a change

effected

« PrécédentContinuer »