Exercises in Classical Ring TheorySpringer-Verlag, 1995 - 287 pages Based in large part on the comprehensive "First Course in Ring Theory" by the same author, this book provides a comprehensive set of problems and solutions in ring theory that will serve not only as a teaching aid to instructors using that book, but also for students, who will see how ring theory theorems are applied to solving ring-theoretic problems and how good proofs are written. The author demonstrates that problem-solving is a lively process: in "Comments" following many solutions he discusses what happens if a hypothesis is removed, whether the exercise can be further generalized, what would be a concrete example for the exercise, and so forth. The book is thus much more than a solution manual. |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-3 sur 7
Page 164
... maximal subfields of D. ( Note that K = Q ( S , y ) and K ' = k ( x ) ( y® ) = Q ( S ' , y ) , where C ' is a ... subfield of D. The argument used in the solution of Exercise 6 shows that K ' = F ( x ) is also a maximal subfield of ...
... maximal subfields of D. ( Note that K = Q ( S , y ) and K ' = k ( x ) ( y® ) = Q ( S ' , y ) , where C ' is a ... subfield of D. The argument used in the solution of Exercise 6 shows that K ' = F ( x ) is also a maximal subfield of ...
Page 176
... Maximal Subfields A subfield K of a division ring D is a maximal subfield iff it is self- centralizing , in the sense that the centralizer CD ( K ) of K in D is just K. Such a maximal subfield always contains F = Z ( D ) , the center of ...
... Maximal Subfields A subfield K of a division ring D is a maximal subfield iff it is self- centralizing , in the sense that the centralizer CD ( K ) of K in D is just K. Such a maximal subfield always contains F = Z ( D ) , the center of ...
Page 177
... maximal subfield of D. But then FC- ( 15.8 ) implies that [ D : F ] < ∞ , again a contradiction . Ex . 15.3 . Let R be a field , ( G , < ) be a nontrivial ordered group , and w : G → Aut R be an injective group homomorphism . Show ...
... maximal subfield of D. But then FC- ( 15.8 ) implies that [ D : F ] < ∞ , again a contradiction . Ex . 15.3 . Let R be a field , ( G , < ) be a nontrivial ordered group , and w : G → Aut R be an injective group homomorphism . Show ...
Table des matières
2 Semisimplicity | 16 |
Jacobson Radical Theory 35 1981 | 35 |
6 Group rings and the Jsemisimplicity problem | 57 |
Droits d'auteur | |
13 autres sections non affichées
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
a₁ abelian artinian ring assume automorphism B₁ central idempotents char commutative ring conjugate consider constructed contradiction decomposition Dedekind-finite defined division ring domain element endomorphism equation Exercise exists fact finite group finite-dimensional follows group G hopfian idempotent identity implies indecomposable integer inverse irreducible isomorphism J-semisimple Jacobson radical k-algebra kG-module left ideal left primitive ring Lemma Let G linear local ring M₁ matrix maximal ideal maximal left ideal maximal subfield minimal left module multiplication Neumann regular ring nil ideal nilpotent ideal noetherian ring noncommutative nonzero polynomial prime ideal primitive idempotents primitive rings proof prove quasi-regular R-module R/rad rad kG representation resp right ideal right R-module ring theory semilocal ring semiprime semisimple ring show that rad simple left R-module simple ring soc(RR Solution stable range strongly regular subdirect product subgroup subring Theorem unit-regular zero