« PrécédentContinuer »
Prophets, neither will they be perfuaded though S ER M.
And this is the Reason why I entered
SERM. the Miracles in the World will not prove,
Iple of Ifrael," and after a fhort Deduction S ER M. of Matters from the calling of Abraham to the Times of David, he then thinks proper to introduce the mention of our Saviour Jefus, by afferting that God had raised him unto Ifrael of this Man's Seed, Acts xiii. 23. i. e. of David's Seed, according to his Promife.
Where you fee plainly he refts the Strength "of his Argument upon the Authority of Prophecy. And all the Parts of his following Difcourfe are anfwerable to the Beginning of it; proceeding from one End to the other upon the Authority of the Prophets." We declare (faith he) v. 32, 33. unto you glad Tidings, how that the Promife which was made unto the Fathers, God bas fulfilled the fame unto us their Children, in that he hath raifed up Jefus again; as it is alfo written in the fecond Pfalm; Thou art my Son, this Day have I begotten thee. So again, Acts xvii. 1-3." at Theffalonica,
where was a Synagogue of the Jews; we read that St. Paul, as his Manner was, went in unto them, and three Sabbath Days reafoned with them out of the Scriptures; opening and alledging, that Chrift muft needs have fuffer'd, and rifen again from the Dead, and that this
* Bishop Sherlock on Prophecy, p. 178, 179.
SERM. Jefus which I preach unto you is Chrift. And in the fame Chapter it is noted, ver. 10, 11. that the Jews at Berea (where Paul afterwards preached) were more noble than those in Theffalonica, in that they received the Word with all Readiness of Mind, and fearched the Scriptures daily, whether those Things were fo. And in the next Chapter we read again, ver. 24-28. that a certain Jew, nam'd Apollos, born at Alexandria, when he himself had been perfectly inftructed in the Way of God, mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, fhewing by the Scriptures that Jefus was Chrift.
In like manner we Chriftians, who from our Infancy are brought up in the Belief of Christianity, and are taught to receive the Books of both Teftaments with equal Reverence; in like manner, I fay, we, when we are to defend our Faith in Jefus as the Chrift, against Jews, who urge that Jefus has not fulfilled the Prophecies contained in the Old Teftament; must shew that what the Prophets did really foretel of the Meffiah, was all actually fulfilled in our Jefus, in Jefus of Nazareth, called by the Jews, the Son of Jojepb.
And this is what I propofe to do: Though SER M. before I enter upon that Subject, it is proper I should mention to you that in my laft Difcourse, I had all along the Advantage, that the Authorities I ufed, and the Books I quoted, were allowed and acknowledged by Jews themselves as well as Chriftians: Whereas in the Profecution of my fecond Head, I have my Authors to establish before I can make use of them. For the Jews and Chriftians both confent that the Prophecies I fingled out in my former Difcourfe, relate to the Meffias; yet when we come to speak of the Completion of them in our Jesus; the Jews protest against any fuch Application, and deny that any of thofe Prophecies were fulfilled in him. And therefore they object to the Divine Authority of the New Teftament, and won't allow the New Teftament to have been written by Inspiration, as we confefs the Old Testament to have been.
But now, whether the Books of the New Teftament were inspired or not; i. e. whether they were written by the immediate Diretion, and under the Super-intendance and Guidance of the Holy Ghoft, is a Question we have no Occafion to enter into, upon this Subject. It is fufficient for the Purpose we