« PrécédentContinuer »
REV. WILLIAM E. CHANNING,
ON THE SUBJECT OF HIS LETTER TO THE
REV. SAMUEL C. THATCHER,
RELATING TO THE
REVIEW IN THE PANOPLIST
BY SAMUEL WORCESTER, D.D.
PASTOR OF THE TABERNACLE CHURCH, SALEM.
REV. AND DEAR SIR,
I HAVE read your Letter to your Friend and Brother, the Rev. SAMUEL C. THATCHER, with some pleasure and with much regret. The causes of the one and of the other will in part be laid open in the subsequent remarks, which I have thought proper to address in the form of a letter to you. I need make no apology: the subject is deeply and extensively interesting; and involves considerations of infinite mo. ment to the general cause, to which you and I profess to be sacredly devoted. Nor shall I make any professions of candour, or charity: for I have been taught by the best of books, that “charity vaunteth not itself, doth not behave itself unseemly;" from other books I have learned, that high professions too often serve to cover a temper very different from that which is not easily provoked,” but “suffereth long and is kind;" and I am thoroughly convinced, that persons who have the greatest confidence in their good dispositions, do not always know “what manner of spirit they are of."
I wish it to be understood, distinctly, that I have no con-' nexion, or privity in this business, with the writer of the Review, which is the subject of your strictures. I write not in his behalf; but in behalf of the general interests of truth, and justice, and mercy. He probably will answer for himself; and to him I shall leave the particular vindication of himself, his statements and conclusions, his spirit and style: a labour which does not belong to me, and which I should be less disinclined to undertake, were the Review in all respects exactly such as I could wish it to have been. It might perhaps have been better, had the Reviewer been less intent on exciting those whose cause he espouses, and consulted more the conviction and benefit of those against whom his animadversions are directed.
With what justice, and to what extent, a similar remark might be applied to your Letter, you, my dear Sir, and your friends will consider. It cannot, however, but be regretted,