Obtenir la version papier de ce livre
À propos de ce livre
Ma bibliothèque
Livres sur Google Play
SECT. X.-Arguments in favour of the opinion, that this
Epiftle was written in Hebrew - page 215
SECT. XI-A new argument, to prove that the Epistle to
the Hebrews was written in Hebrew, derived from the
quotations which are made in it from the Old Tefta-
ment
-
221
SECT. XII.-Confutation of the arguments alleged in favour
of the opinion, that it was written in Greek
226
SECT. XIII.—Examination of the question, whether the
Greek Epiftle to the Hebrews is in all respects an accurate
tranflation of the original
234
SECT. XIV. Remarks on the Greek fiyle of the Epistle to
the Hebrews
242
SECT. XV. Of the author of this Epiftle; whether it was
written by St. Paul; first of the opinion of the ancients
on this fubject -
245
SECT. XVI. Of the internal marks or characters in the
Epiftle itself, from which an inference may be drawn,
either in favour of, or against the opinion, that St. Paul
was the author
252
SECT. XVII.-Examination of the opinion entertained by
Jome of the ancients, that Barnabas was the author 258
SECT. XVIII. Of the canonical authority of this Epif-
tle
SECT. XIX.-Of the contents of this Epiftle
264
CHAP. XXV.
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE CATHOLIC EPISTLES -
269
CHAP.
CHAP. XXVI.
OF THE EPISTLE OF ST. JAMES.
SECT. I. Previous obfervations, relative to the James who
was called the brother of Jefus
page 271
SECT. H.-Whether the author of this Epiftle was an
Apofile; and if he was, whether he was the elder or the
younger Apostle James
277
SECT. III. Whether the author of this Epifle was James,
called the brother of Jefus
284
SECT. IV. Of the perfons, to whom this Epifle was
written -
292
296
SECT. V. Of the contents of this Epifle
SECT. VI. Whether St. James's doctrine, concerning faith
and works, contradicts St. Paul's doctrine of faith with-
out works
302
SECT. VII. Of the time when the Epistle of St. James
was written
306
SECT. VIII-Of the canonical authority of this Epif-
308
CHAP. XXVII.
OF THE FIRST EPISTLE OF ST. PETER.
SECT. I. Of the perfons to whom St. Peter addreffed this
Epiftle
·
315
323
SECT. II.-Before St. Peter wrote this Epifle, he appears
to have read St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans
SECT. III. Of the time when this Epifle was writ-
ten
325
SECT. IV.
SECT. IV.-Babylon, the place whence St. Peter dates his
firfi Epiftle, is either the ancient Babylon on the Euphrates,
or Seleucia on the Tigris: but more probably the for-
mer
page 328
SECT. V. Confutation of the arguments alleged in favour
of a myftical interpretation of the word Babylon
334
SECT. VI. Of the contents and defign of this Epiftle - 341
SECT. VII.—Of St. Peter's mode of writing, and the pecu-
liarities of his Greek Style
344
CHAP. XXVIII.
OF THE SECOND EPISTLE OF ST. PETER.
SECT. I. Of the authenticity of this Epifle
SECT. II. Of the time when it was written
SECT. III. Of the defign of this Epiftle
346
356
367
CHAP. XXIX.
OF THE EPISTLE OF ST. JUDE.
SECT. I. Of the author of this Epiftle, whether he was
an Apoftle, called Jude, or whether he was Jude the
brother-in-law of Jesus
363
SECT. II. Of the perfons to whom, and of the time when,
this Epiftle was written: and whether the author of it
had read the fecond Epiftle of St. Peter
37L
SECT. III. Of the canonical authority of this Epifile: and
firft of the external evidence in its favour
374
SECT. IV. The fame question examined from internal evia
dence
page 378
SECT. V. Refult of the inquiry inftituted in the preceding
fections; and the question in debate brought to a final
iffue
394
CHA P. XXX.
OF THE FIRST EPISTLE OF ST. JOHN.
SECT. I.-Of the time when this Epiftle was written 395
SECT. II.-Of the perfons to whom it was written
399
SECT. III. Of the contents and defign of this Epifle 401
SECT. II.-Five charges against 1 John v. 7, admitted by
Bengel
416
SECT. III. Of the authorities which have been adduced in
favour of 1 John v. 7.
419
SECT. IV. The Alogi did not reject the first Epistle of St.
John: confequently in their time, that is, in the fecond
century, the Epiftle did not contain the controverted paf-
fage
428
SECT. V. Of the reafons alleged for retaining i John v. 7.
though the evidence of manuscripts, fathers, and verfions
is decidedly against it
431
SECT. VI.
SECT. VI-In what manner 1 John v. 7. was first intro-
duced into the Latin verfion, and afterwards into our
printed editions of the Greek Teftament
page 434
SECT. VII.-Luther did not admit 1 John v. 7, into his
German verfion of the Bible
438
CHA P. XXXII.
OF THE TWO LAST EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN.
SECT. I. Of the canonical authority of thefe two Epi
tles
SECT. II. Of the time when thefe Epiftles were writ-
'ten
445
SECT. III. Whether the fecond Epiftle was fent to a par-
ticular perfon, or to a whole church
448
SECT. IV. Of the contents, and defign of the third Epif
45I
SECT. V. Of the perfon of Caius, to whom the third Epif-
tle is addreffed
454
SECT. I
CHAP. XXXIII.
OF THE APOCALYPSE.
Previous apology for the author's uncertainty, in
refpect to the Apocalyple
457
SECT. II.-Teftimonies of the earliest ecclefiaftical writers,
both for and against the Apocalypfe
461
SECT. III-Inference deduced from the preceding fec-