Ciceronian Controversies

JoAnn DellaNeva, Brian Marshall Duvick
Harvard University Press, 2007 - 295 pages
0 Avis

The most important literary dispute of the Renaissance pitted those writers of Neo-Latin who favored imitation of Cicero alone, as the single best exemplar of Latin prose, against those who preferred to follow an eclectic array of literary models. This Ciceronian controversy is the subject of the texts collected for the first time in this volume: exchanges of letters between Angelo Poliziano and Paolo Cortesi; between Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola and Pietro Bembo; and between Giovambattista Giraldi Cinzio and his mentor Celio Calcagnini. A postscript by Lilio Gregorio Giraldi and writings by Antonio Possevino comment further on this correspondence.

Because they address some of the most fundamental aspects of literary production, these quarrels shed light on similar debates about vernacular literature, which also turned on imitation and the role of the author. The Ciceronian controversy can also be seen as part of larger cultural movements, such as the choice of vernacular language over Latin, the development of Jesuit pedagogy, and the religious conflicts that characterized much of the Renaissance.


Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire

Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.

Table des matières

Angelo Poliziano to Paolo Cortesi
The PicoBembo Exchange 151213
Pietro Bembo to Gianfrancesco Pico
Gianfrancesco Pico to Pietro Bembo
The CinzioCalcagniniLilio Exchange 153237
Celio Calcagnini to Giambattista Giraldi
Lilio Gregorio Giraldi to Giambattista
Note on the Text and Translation
Notes to the Text
Notes to the Translation
Droits d'auteur

Autres éditions - Tout afficher

Expressions et termes fréquents

À propos de l'auteur (2007)

JoAnn DellaNeva is Associate Professor of Romance Languages and Literatures, University of Notre Dame.

Brian Duvick is an Instructor in Philosophy, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.

Informations bibliographiques