Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple: Symbolism and Supersessionism in the Study of Ancient Judaism
Oxford University Press, 10 nov. 2005 - 384 pages
Ancient Jewish sacrifice has long been misunderstood. Some find in sacrifice the key to the mysterious and violent origins of human culture. Others see these cultic rituals as merely the fossilized vestiges of primitive superstition. Some believe that ancient Jewish sacrifice was doomed from the start, destined to be replaced by the Christian eucharist. Others think that the temple was fated to be superseded by the synagogue. In Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple Jonathan Klawans demonstrates that these supersessionist ideologies have prevented scholars from recognizing the Jerusalem temple as a powerful source of meaning and symbolism to the ancient Jews who worshiped there. Klawans exposes and counters such ideologies by reviewing the theoretical literature on sacrifice and taking a fresh look at a broad range of evidence concerning ancient Jewish attitudes toward the temple and its sacrificial cult. The first step toward reaching a more balanced view is to integrate the study of sacrifice with the study of purity-a ritual structure that has commonly been understood as symbolic by scholars and laypeople alike. The second step is to rehabilitate sacrificial metaphors, with the understanding that these metaphors are windows into the ways sacrifice was understood by ancient Jews. By taking these steps-and by removing contemporary religious and cultural biases-Klawans allows us to better understand what sacrifice meant to the early communities who practiced it. Armed with this new understanding, Klawans reevaluates the ideas about the temple articulated in a wide array of ancient sources, including Josephus, Philo, Pseudepigrapha, the Dead Sea Scrolls, New Testament, and Rabbinic literature. Klawans mines these sources with an eye toward illuminating the symbolic meanings of sacrifice for ancient Jews. Along the way, he reconsiders the ostensible rejection of the cult by the biblical prophets, the Qumran sect, and Jesus. While these figures may have seen the temple in their time as tainted or even defiled, Klawans argues, they too-like practically all ancient Jews-believed in the cult, accepted its symbolic significance, and hoped for its ultimate efficacy.
Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
4QMMT ancient Israel ancient Jewish ancient Jews ancient Judaism angels animal antitemple approach argued articulated assert atonement biblical chapter Chilton Christian concern cosmos cult cultic Dead Sea Scrolls discussion divine presence Douglas Douglas’s earthly temple Enoch eucharist evidence evolutionist Exod explicitly Ezekiel Girard heavenly temple Hebrew Bible holy Hubert and Mauss idea imitatio imitatio Dei interpretation Israelite Jerusalem temple Jesus Josephus Klawans Last Supper Le´vi-Strauss Leviticus 1–16 Menahot metaphor Midrash Midrash Tadshe Milgrom Mishnah moral defilement notion offerings origins passage Philo practice prayer priesthood priestly traditions priests prophets Purity and Danger purity and sacrifice Qumran Rabbah rabbinic literature rabbinic sources rejection rites ritual defilement ritual impurity ritual purity Robertson Smith Sacred sacrificial process sacrificial rituals sanctuary scholarly scholars Second Temple Second Temple period speak studies suggest symbolic synagogue Talmud tannaitic temple incident Temple Scroll temple’s Testament texts theory understanding understood various worship Yoma