Some are afraid of the word, as if it would weaken love and the idea of a new creation. Scripture is not. Obedience and keeping the commandments of one we love, is the proof of that love, and the delight of the new nature. Did I do all right and not do it in obedience, I should do nothing right, because my true relationship and heart-reference to God would be left out. This is love, that we keep His commandments. We are sanctified to the obedience of Christ. Christ Himself says, "The Prince of this world cometh and hath nothing in me; but that the world may know that I love the Father, and as the Father hath given me commandment so I do." His highest act of love is his highest act of obedience.

But this it is that just makes it so mischievous to put the Christian under the law, and change the scripture phraseology to another, and speak of the moral law being given as a rule of life; and, having no passage in which moral law" is used, quoting Paul's statements as to "law," from which he says, and insists on it as one of the chief topics of his teaching, we are delivered.

Not

merely that we are not justified by its works (yet we should be if the moral law were kept, and so he declares, "the doers of the law shall be justified;") but that we are delivered from it. A Christian is delivered from it, because it is ruinous in its effect, whenever applied to men who are fallen. Not clearly the ceremonial law: that he could fulfil, however burdensome it might be. It is the moral law which is ruinous in its effect to every fallen son of Adam. Is it morality that is ruinous, or obedience to Christ's precepts? That were a blasphemy to say, and shocking to every Christian mind. But it is of law, the Apostle declares, what was ordained to life he found to be to death, Rom. vii. It is a ministration of death, and ministration of condemnation, 2 Cor. iii. 7-9. As many as are of its works-on the principle of it-its works are not bad ones-are under a curse, Gal. iii. 10. That is, law means, in the Apostle's teaching, something else than a rule or measure of conduct. It is a principle of dealing with men which necessarily destroys and coudemns them. This is the way the Spirit of God uses law in contrast with Christ, and never in Christian teaching

puts men under it; but carefully shews how they are delivered from it, are no longer under it. Nor does Scripture ever think of saying, You are not under the law in one way, but you are in another; you are not for justification, but you are as a rule of life. It declares you are not under law, but under grace. And if you are under law, you are condemned and under a curse; it must have its own proper force and effect. Remark, it puts it as a principle contrasted with grace. But will a man say: You wrong us in saying we hold that a Christian is under law. I ask how is that obligatory which a man is not under- from which he is delivered? No; the Apostle carefully insists that the law is good, that it is not the fault of the law that we are condemned, if we have to say to it, but he as carefully declares we are if we have; and that, in fact, we are delivered from it. That if led of the Spirit we are not under law, He uses it to express a principle, a manner of dealing on the part of God contrasted with grace. That is the way he speaks of law. I repeat it, scripture speaks elaborately of being delivered from the law as ministering death and a curse, declaring that we are not under it. Use the term moral law, and say so, and see where you bring us. But, that this may be before our eyes, I will quote some Scriptures that we may see that this is no light subject, nor strained assertion," As many as are of the works of the law are under a curse." "The law entered that the offence might abound." Mark the word entered (Tapetonλ0€). It was a principle, a system, a way of dealing that came in. "Sin shall not have dominion over you, because you are not under the law but under grace.' "The sting of death is sin, the strength of sin is the law." "I was alive without the law once, but when the commandment caine, sin revived, and I died." Is the Apostle speaking of the ceremonial law? Far from it; he is speaking of the law in its moral nature and essence. He says, I had not known lust except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet (lust). And when he had said that sin should not have dominion over us, because we are not under the law, he immediately adds: What, then, shall we sin, because we are not under law but under grace? Shewing that the

introduction of the notion of the ceremonial law has no place at all here. Nor is it justification he is speaking of here, but serving sin or the contrary. No. He treats the whole question of law in a way totally different, and contrary to that in which it is treated in much evangelical teaching. I continue, "Sin taking occasion by the commandment wrought in me all manner of concupiscence." "Sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good, that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful." Is this ceremonial law? It is a principle on which God placed man "four hundred and thirty years after the promise," which "was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made." But now the seed is come to whom the promise was made, and "now we are delivered from the law." What the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God has done in another way. How we are delivered from the law, so as not to allow sin, I shall speak of just now. I am now shewing that Scripture treats the question of law in another way from that I am here examining. Before faith came we were kept under the law. But after that faith came we were no longer under the Schoolmaster. If the inheritance be of the law it is no more of promise, but God gave it unto Abraham by promise. The law was added. Further, if there had been a law given which could have given life, righteousness should have been by the law. But the Scripture has concluded all under sin." "I, through law," says the Apostle," am dead to law, that I might live to God." "If I am led of the Spirit I am not under law." "Ye are become dead to the law, by the body of Christ, that ye might be married to another." "It is the ministration of death written and engraven in stones." How is it possible, if law could be used as the moral law, by which a Christian is bound, that the Apostle should say, "Wherefore, my brethren, ye are become dead to the law by the body of Christ." It would be, as Paul says, making Christ the minister of sin. Let it not be atteinpted to be said, Oh, but He is speaking of justification by works of law. He is doing nothing of the kind. His words are-Ye are become

dead to the law by the body of Christ, that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that ye might bring forth fruit unto God. Being dead to the law is the way to bring forth fruit. So in Galatians. I, through the law, am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. If I would bring forth fruit and live to God, I must be dead to law. Law is a principle on which we cannot live to God any more than we can be justified. No doubt we cannot be justified by works of law, but there is much more than that. It condemns us positively if we are under it. It "works wrath." It cannot give life, but that is not all. It is a ministration of death-is found to be unto death. It is "the strength of sin." By it, as an occasion, sin works in us all manner of concupiscence- bringing forth fruit unto death. The motions of sin are by the law. It makes sin exceeding sinful. Is all this Scripture or is it not? Will it be said that this was the effect of law, out of and before Christ? Let the reader remember that the Apostle is writing to Christians, and reasoning against a tendency and an effort which beset Christians everywhere to bring in the obligation of the law after Christ. And he shews the working of the law, for any that took it up to bring its obligations upon them when they were Christians, and declared that he who had been under law was delivered from it, and that it was a Schoolmaster up to faith; but that when faith came men were no longer under it. The subject he is everywhere treating is law in its nature," or specifically an attempt to place men under its obligation after they had received the faith. Law has its own

proper effect. This leads me to the text constantly quoted: "Yea, we establish the law." And here I would pray you to weigh what I say. I declare, according to Scripture, that law must always have its effect as declared in the word of God, always necessarily upon whoever is under it; but that that effect is always,

The reader who understands Greek will see that, in a multitude of instances, where "the" law would seem to refer to Jewish law, the Apostle is speaking of law as a principle. In fact, Judaism was the only case where God had tried this principle, so that it comes in the main to the same thing.

according to Scripture, condemnation and death, and nothing else upon a being who has in him a lust or a fault. That it knows no mercy, but that it pronounces a curse upon every one who does not continue in all things written in it; and that whosoever is of the works of the law is under a curse. Now, in fact, the Christian has sin in him as a human being, and alas! fails; and if law applies to him he is under the curse, for it brings a curse on every one who sins. Do I enfeeble its authority? I maintain it, and establish it in the fullest way. I say, Have you to say to the law? Then you are under a curse. No escaping, no exemption. Its authority and claim must be maintained. Its righteous exactions made good. Have you failed? Yes, you have. You are under the curse. No, you say, but I am a Christian, the law is still binding upon me, but I am not under a curse. Has not the law pronounced a curse on one who fails? Yes. You are under it. You have failed, and are not cursed after all! Its authority is not maintained. For you are under it; it has cursed you, and you are not cursed. If you had said, I was under it and failed, and Christ died and bore its curse; and now, as redeemed, I am on another footing and not under law, but under grace, its authority is maintained. But if you are put back again under law, after Christ has died and risen again, and you are in Christ and you fail and come under no curse, its authority is destroyed; for it pronounces a curse, and you are not cursed at all. The man who puts a Christian under law destroys the authority of the law, or puts the Christian under the curse, for in many things we all offend. He fancies he establishes law. He destroys its authority. He only establishes the full immutable authority of law, who declares that a Christian is not under it at all; and therefore, cannot be cursed by its just and holy curse. What the measure of Christian conduct is, I shall shew from Scripture before I close. I only remark now, that, in point of fact, what we specially need, is not the rule of right and wrong, though that be most useful and necessary and in its place, but motive and power for our new nature. The law gives neither. The Scripture declares, it is an occasion for sins working