The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human ExtinctionPsychology Press, 1998 - 310 pages Are we in imminent danger of extinction? Yes, we probably are, argues John Leslie in his chilling account of the dangers facing the human race as we approach the second millenium. The End of the World is a sobering assessment of the many disasters that scientists have predicted and speculated on as leading to apocalypse. In the first comprehensive survey, potential catastrophes - ranging from deadly diseases to high-energy physics experiments - are explored to help us understand the risks. One of the greatest threats facing humankind, however, is the insurmountable fact that we are a relatively young species, a risk which is at the heart of the 'Doomsday Argument'. This argument, if correct, makes the dangers we face more serious than we could have ever imagined. This more than anything makes the arrogance and ignorance of politicians, and indeed philosophers, so disturbing as they continue to ignore the manifest dangers facing future generations. |
Table des matières
WAR POLLUTION DISEASE | 25 |
OTHER DANGERS | 81 |
JUDGING THE RISKS | 133 |
WHY PROLONG HUMAN HISTORY? | 155 |
THE DOOMSDAY ARGUMENT | 187 |
TESTING THE ARGUMENT | 237 |
PRISONERS DILEMMA AND NUCLEAR | 267 |
| 289 | |
| 306 | |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
actually alive anthropic principle argued asteroid B-theory bacteria batch Bayesian become black holes bombs born Brandon Carter carbon Carter's cent chance chapter CO₂ collision cosmic rays created dangerous destroy developed dice disaster disease Doom Soon doomsday argument double-six Earth energy estimate ethical evidence exactly existence expect experiments explosion extinction extraterrestrials fact fairly future galactic colonization galaxy genes genetically engineered greenhouse grounds happy huge human race humankind hundred increase indeterministic instance intelligent laser later least Leslie Little Puddle lives matter million missiles moral nuclear nuclear war observers ozone layer particles perhaps philosophers planet pollution population position possible prior probabilities probability produce quantum radically indeterministic reasoning red ball requiredness risk scalar field situation species stars strange matter suggest Suppose sure survive theory things thought thousand threat tiny tons trillion trillion universe vacuum vacuum metastability disaster viruses wrong