A

BRIEF VINDICATION

OF

THE NONCONFORMISTS

FROM THE

CHARGE OF SCHISM:

AS IT WAS MANAGED AGAINST THEM IN A SERMON PREACHED BEFORE THE LORD MAYOR; BY DR. STILLINGFLEET, DEAN OF ST. PAULS.

Coitio Christianorum merito sane illicita, si illicitis par; merito damnanda, si quis de ea queritur eo titulo quo de factionibus querela est. In cujus perniciem aliquando convenimus? Hoc sumus congregati quod et dispersi; hoc universi quod et singuli; neminem lædentes, neminem contristantes; quum probi, cum boni coeunt, cum pii, cum casti congregantur, non est factio dicenda, sed curia.— Tertul.

BRIEF VINDICATION

OF

THE NONCONFORMISTS

FROM THE

CHARGE OF SCHISM.

IT

was no small surprise unto many, first to hear of, and then to see in print, the late sermon of the Rev. Dean of St. Paul's, preached at Guildhall, May 2, 1680, being the first Sunday in Easter Term, before the Lord Mayor, &c.

Whatever there might be of truth in it, yet they judged the time both of the one and the other, the preaching and printing of it, to be somewhat unseasonable. For, they say, that this is a time wherein the agreement of all Protestants, so far as they have attained, is made more than ordinarily necessary. And whereas the nonconformists do agree in religion with all the sober Protestant people of the nation, which is the church of England, they do suppose that ordinary prudence would advise unto a forbearance of them in those few things wherein they dissent, not indeed from the body of the Protestant people, but from some that would impose them on their consciences and practices. Who knows not that the present danger of this nation is from popery, and the endeavours that are used both to introduce it and enthrone it, or give it power and authority among us? And it is no part of the popish design to take away and destroy those things wherein the nonconformists do dissent from the present ecclesiastical establishment, but rather to confirm them. Their contrivance is to ruin and destroy the religion of the body of the Protestants in this kingdom, wherein the nonconformists are one with them, and equally concerned with any of them. Wherefore it cannot but be grievous

unto them, as well as useless unto the common interest of the Protestant religion, that at such a time and season they should be reflected on, charged and severely treated on the account of those lesser differences which no way disenable them from being useful and serviceable unto the government and nation in the defence and preservation of the Protestant religion. And that it is their resolution so to be, they have given sufficient evidence, equal at least with that given by any sort of people in the nation; yea, of their diligence in opposition unto popery, and their readiness to observe the direction of the magistrates therein whilst the plot hath been in agitation; they suppose the honourable person unto whom this sermon is dedicated, can and will bear them witness.

In these circumstances, to be required severely to change their judgments and practices, as it were momento turbinis,' immediately and in an instant; or else to be looked on and treated as adversaries; many do think as unseasonable, as to command a good part of an army when it is actually engaged against an enemy, to change all their order, postures, discipline, and advantages, or immediately to depart out of the field. And they do withal suppose that such a sudden change is least of all to be expected to be wrought by such severe charges and reflections as are made on all nonconformists in this discourse. Such like things as these do men talk concerning the season of the preaching and publishing of this sermon: but in such things every man is to be left unto his own prudence, whereof he may not esteem himself obliged to give an account.

For my part, I judge it not so unseasonable as some others do. For it is meet that honest men should understand the state of those things wherein they are greatly and deeply concerned. Nonconformists might possibly suppose, that the common danger of all Protestants had reconciled the minds of the conforming ministry unto them, so as that they were more than formerly inclined unto their forbearance, and I was really of the same judgment myself. If it be not so, it is well they are fairly warned what they have to expect, that they may prepare themselves to undergo it with patience. But we shall pass by these things, and attend a little unto the consideration of the sermon itself.

The design of this discourse seems to consist in these three things, or to aim at them."

1. To prove all the nonconformists to be guilty of schism, and a sinful separation from the church of England.

2. To aggravate their supposed guilt and crime, both in its nature, and all the pernicious consequences of it that can be imagined.

3. To charge them, especially their ministers, with want of sincerity and honesty in the management of their dissent from the church of England, with reference unto the people that hear them. What there is of truth in these things, or what there may be of mistake in them, it is the duty of nonconformists to try and examine. But some few things must have a previous consideration before we come to the merits of the cause itself.

1. The reverend author of this discourse affirms, that in the preaching of this sermon he was far from intending to stir up the magistrates and judges unto a persecution of dissenters, as some ill men have reported.' Epist. Ded. Without this information I confess I could not but judge it would have been as liable unto a supposition of such a design, as the actings of the nonconformists in the management of their cause, are unto that of insincerity in the judgment of this reverend author. For,

(1.) It was not preached unto nonconformists, perhaps not one of them being present; so that the intention of preaching it could not be their conviction. They were not likely either to hear the charge, or the reasons of it.

(2.) It was preached unto them who were no way guilty of the pretended crime reproved; but peculiarly such as were intrusted with the execution of the penal laws against them that were supposed guilty, magistrates and judges, which in another would have but an ill aspect. If a man should go unto a justice of the peace, and complain that his neighbour is a thief, or a swearer, or a murderer; though he should give the justice never so many arguments to prove that his neighbour did very ill in being so and doing so, yet his business would seem to be the execution of the law upon him. But let the will of God be done, nonconformists are not much concerned in these things.

We are likewise informed in the same epistle, that there