and yet make the Father and Son to be two Gods 182, 189
make metaphysics their last retreat 4, 63, 105, 307, 391, 399, 448, 467, 470, 475 fix new ideas to old terms, 288, 303, 305, 471 their fundamental error, 399
what Athanasius cited and vindicated
62, 276, 402, 403, 459 Greg. Nazianzen's character 418, 420
Epiphanius cited and explained 59, 276 Equality of nature in the God- head, what it means 164
397 127, 271, 273, 370, 465 C. Characters of the one true God applied to the Son 207 Clarke, (Dr.) his notion of indi- vidual substance 299, 398 of idol mediators 345, 346 his distinction of will of ap- probation, and will of choice 288
partial in his quotations 446, 464 his propositions novel and false 441 Clemens of Alexandria cited and vindicated 66, 87, 95, 134, 254, 257, 273, 358, 359 Coequality confounded with co- ordination consistent with priority of 23, 94, 179, 400
order Creation, by or through Christ, how to be understood 31, 172 by the three Persons in con-
Eternity ascribed to Father and Son in the same Scripture- phrases 226 Eusebius cited 36, 117, 141, 154, 313, 373 How far his authority is to
be received 36, 380 Exclusive terms sometimes leave room for tacit exceptions 29, 52, 78 to be understood only in opposition to what they are op- 53, 92, 182, 356
is the head of both the other Persons 61 Father's divinity, every argument for it defeated by the modern Arians
230 Fathers, (Ante-Nicene) constant- ly appealed to by the Catholics in the Arian controversy, (see Ancients) v-xix Fundamental article of religion; the controverted article such a 15
« PrécédentContinuer » |