as long as the laws in force on the subject in those countries remain unchanged. All whom it may concern shall be guided accordingly. Under Our Royal hand and seal. FREDERICK R. [L. S.] SIGURD BERG. 1907. PROTECTION OF TRADE-MARKS IN CHINA; AGREEMENT EFFECTED BY EXCHANGE OF Notes. Mr. Brun to Mr. Root. [Translation.] LEGATION OF DENMARK, Washington, D. C., March 19, 1907. MR. SECRETARY OF STATE: By order of my Government I have the honor to beg that Your Excellency will kindly let me know whether the Government of the United States would be disposed to conclude an arrangement with the Government of the King for the reciprocal protection in China of the trade-marks of the citizens of our two countries when the said trade-marks are duly registered in the country of the infringer. Should the Government of the United States be disposed to conclude such an arrangement, the King's Government would take the necessary measures to have Danish subjects who would infringe in China an American trade-mark duly registered in Denmark, brought before the Danish Consular Court at Shanghai and eventully punished in accordance with the provisions of the law of Denmark. The Government of the King would expect the Government of the United States to take similar measures in regard to American citizens who might violate in China the privilege of a Danish subject whose trade-mark is duly registered in the United States. I am authorized to add that my Government would be very glad if such an arrangement could be effected by means of an exchange of notes between Your Excellency and me. Hoping that Your Excellency will see no objection to assenting to this proposal of my Government, I beg you to accept, Mr. Secretary of State, the renewed assurance of my high consideration. C. BRUN. Mr. Root to Mr. Brun. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, SIR: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of the 19th instant, in which, by order of your Government, you inquire whether the Government of the United States would be disposed to conclude with that of Denmark an arrangement by an exchange of notes for the reciprocal protection in China of trade-marks of the citizens of either country from infringement by citizens of the other when the said trade-marks are duly registered in the country of the infringer. By this agreement Danish subjects infringing in China an American trade-mark duly registered in Denmark would, you state, be brought before the Danish Consular Court at Shanghai and eventually punished in accordance with the provisions of the law of Denmark, and the Government of the King would expect the Government of the United States to take similar measure in regard to American citizens who might violate in China the privilege of a Danish subject whose trade-mark is duly registered in the United States. The agreement proposed by your Government is in line with the agreements which have been effected by exchange of notes between the Minister of the United States at Peking and the diplomatic representatives there of certain other countries. It is to be pointed out, however, that in view of the fact that there is no statute in the United States making the infringementcounterfeiting, etc., of a trade-mark-a criminal offense, and that effectual provision exists by a civil action for damages by the owner of a trade-mark, the word "punishment" is to be understood, with respect to the United States, to refer to a civil action only and not to à criminal procedure. If this explanation, which has been made in the case of each of the agreements mentioned above, is satisfactory to your Government, I shall be pleased to make the exchange of notes with you. Accept, Mr. Minister, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration. MR. SECRETARY OF STATE: Referring to note No. 671, which Your Excellency had the kindness to address to the legation on March 25 last, I have the honor, by order of my Government, to inform you that the necessary instructions have been sent to the Danish consul at Shanghai (the consular headquarters for the whole of China) in order to authorize him to protect American trade-marks, duly deposited in Denmark, against violations by Danish subjects in China, to the same extent as Danish marks of the same nature are protected. The law which the Danish court at Shanghai is called upon to enforce in the premises is the Danish law of April 11, 1890, amended by the law of December 19, 1898, and the ordinances of September 28, 1894, and September 12, 1902. Hoping to receive a note informing me that the diplomatic and consular officers of the United States in the Middle Kingdom have had the necessary instructions sent to them in order to insure reciprocity by granting the protection of the United States Consular Courts in China to Danish subjects against American citizens who have counterfeited Danish trade-marks regularly deposited in the United States, I beg of you, Mr. Secretary of State, to accept the renewed assurance of my highest consideration. J. CLAN. Mr. Root to Mr. Clan. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, SIR: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of the 27th ultimo by which you inform me that in pursuance of the understanding reached by the correspondence which passed between the Danish legation and the Department of State on March 19 and 25, 1907, the necessary instructions have been sent to the Danish consul at Shanghai (the consular headquarters for the whole of China) in order to authorize him to protect American trade-marks, duly deposited in Denmark, against violations by Danish subjects in China, to the same extent as Danish marks of the nature are protected. As a completion of the exchange of notes to give the said understanding effect, I have the honor to inform you that, on the part of the United States, the Minister of the United States at Peking has this day been instructed to inform the consular officers of the United States in China that hereafter trade-marks of Danish subjects, which have been duly registered in the United States, are to be protected against infringement by such persons as come under the jurisdiction of the United States Consular Courts in China. Accept, sir, the renewed assurances of my high consideration. ELIHU ROOT. 1908. ARBITRATION CONVENTION. Signed at Washington, May 18, 1908; ratification advised by the Senate, May 20, 1908; ratified by the President, January 8, 1909; ratified by Denmark, February 15, 1909; ratifications exchanged at Washington, March 29, 1909; proclaimed, March 29, 1909. I. Differences to be submitted. II. Special agreement. ARTICLES. III. Duration. The Government of the United States of America and His Majesty the King of Denmark, signatories of the Convention for the pacific settlement of international disputes, concluded at The Hague on the 29th July, 1899; Taking into consideration that by Article XIX of that Convention the High Contracting Parties have reserved to themselves the right of concluding Agreements, with a view to referring to arbitra 24449-VOL 1-10-26 tion all questions which they shall consider possible to submit to such treatment; Have authorized the Undersigned to conclude the following arrangement: ARTICLE I. Differences which may arise of a legal nature, or relating to the interpretation of treaties existing between the two Contracting Parties, and which it may not have been possible to settle by diplomacy, shall be referred to the Permanent Court of Arbitration established at The Hague by the Convention of the 29th July, 1899, provided, nevertheless, that they do not affect the vital interests, the independence, or the honor of the two Contracting States, and do not concern the interests of third Parties. ARTICLE II. In each individual case the High Contracting Parties, before appealing to the Permanent Court of Arbitration shall conclude a special Agreement defining clearly the matter in dispute, the scope of the powers of the Arbitrators, and the periods to be fixed for the formation of the Arbitral Tribunal and the several stages of the procedure. It is understood that such special agreements on the part of the United States will be made by the President of the United States, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate thereof, and on the part of Denmark by the King in such forms and conditions as He may find requisite or appropriate. ARTICLE III. The present Convention is concluded for a period of five years, dating from the day of the exchange of the ratifications. ARTICLE IV. The present Convention shall be ratified by the President of the United States of America, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate thereof; and by His Majesty the King of Denmark. The ratifications of this Convention shall be exchanged at Washington as soon as possible, and it shall take effect on the date of the exchange of its ratifications. Done in duplicate in the English and Danish languages, at Washington, this 18th day of May in the year 1908. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. 1867.@ CONVENTION OF AMITY, COMMERCE, AND NAVIGATION AND FOR THE SURRENDER OF FUGITIVE CRIMINALS. Concluded February 8, 1867; ratification advised by the Senate, March 20, 1867; ratified by the President, July 31, 1867; ratifications exchanged October 5, 1867; proclaimed October 24, 1867. The United States of America and the Dominican Republic, equally animated with the desire of maintaining the cordial relations and of tightening, if possible, the bonds of friendship between the two countries, as well as to augment, by all the means at their disposal, the commercial intercourse of their respective citizens, have mutually resolved to conclude a general convention of amity, commerce and navigation, and for the surrender of fugitive criminals. For this purpose they have appointed as their Plenipotentiaries, to wit: The President of the United States, John Somers Smith, Commercial Agent of the United States at the city of Santo Domingo, and the President of the Dominican Republic, José Gabriel Garcia, Secretary of State in the Department of Foreign Relations, and Juan Ramon Fiallo, ex-Secretary of the Treasury; Who, after a communication of their respective full powers, have agreed to the following articles: ARTICLE I. It is the intention of the high contracting parties that there shall continue to be a firm, inviolable and universal peace, and a true and • This convention terminated January 13, 1898, on notice from the Dominican Government. |