Rethinking WritingRoy Harris shows that the theory of writing adopted in modern linguistics is deeply flawed. Reversing the orthodox priorities, the author argues that writing is a far more powerful mode of linguistic communication than speech could ever be. His book is a major contribution to current debates about human communication written and spoken.> |
Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.
Table des matières
| 17 | |
| 39 | |
| 64 | |
Notes on Notation | 91 |
Alphabetical Disorder | 121 |
Ideographic Hallucinations | 138 |
On the Dotted Line | 161 |
Beyond the Linguistic Pale | 184 |
Mightier than the Word | 215 |
Bibliography | 243 |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
alphabetic principle alphabetic writing already analysis Aristotle Aristotle's assumption basis biomechanical century character chess Chinese Chinese characters communication concept consonant context corresponding Cours culture distinction English exactly example existence fact Finnegans Wake function Gislebertus glossematic glottic writing graphic graphologists homographs human idea ideogram ideographic ideographic writing image acoustique important integrational integrationist kind Latin alphabet letters linguistic lipogram literate society marks means metasign modern notation notion object oiseau oral orthographic phonetic pictographic Plato possible pre-literate principle problem pronunciation question Quintilian reader recognized relationship represent representation rethink writing Saussure Saussure's Saussurean script semio semiological value semiology of writing Semitic sense signature signifiant social sounds speech and writing spelling spoken language spoken word structuralist structure syllabic symbol systems of signs term theoretical theorists theory thinking tion units utilitarian literacy visible speech visual vocal sign vowels wazo writing systems written form written sign written text
Fréquemment cités
Page 73 - But though words, as they are used by men, can properly and immediately signify nothing but the ideas that are in the mind of the speaker, yet they in their thoughts give them a secret reference to two other things. First, They suppose their words to be marks of the ideas in the minds also of other men with whom they communicate...
Page 221 - The fall (bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthur nuk!) of a once wallstrait oldparr is retaled early in bed and later on life down through all Christian minstrelsy. The great fall of the offwall entailed at such short notice the pftjschute of...
Page 18 - The same holds true of written words; you might suppose that they understand what they are saying, but if you ask them what they mean by anything they simply return the same answer over and over again.
Page vii - ... difficult, as proceeding from a watchful observation of the divers motions of the tongue, palate, lips, and other organs of speech, whereby to make as many differences of characters, to remember them. But the most noble and profitable invention of all other was that of 'speech...
Page 41 - A language is a system of signs expressing ideas, and hence comparable to writing, the deaf-and-dumb alphabet, symbolic rites, forms of politeness, military signals, and so on. It is simply the most important of such systems. It is therefore possible to conceive of a science which studies the role of signs as part of social life. It would form part of social psychology, and hence of general psychology. We shall call it semiology (from the Greek semeion 'sign'). It would investigate the nature of...
Page 39 - ZrifituaTiKii or the doctrine of signs, the most usual whereof being words, it is aptly enough termed also AoyiKfi, logic; the business whereof is to consider the nature of signs the mind makes use of for the understanding of things, or conveying its knowledge to others.
Page 64 - A symbol is a representamen whose representative character consists precisely in its being a rule that will determine its interpretant.
