Images de page
PDF
ePub

third or central aperture E being occupied by a copper tube EF, closed below, and containing oil or other viscid liquid,

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]

to act as a bath for the bulb of the thermometer F and its

protector from the pressure of the vapour. The method

of using this apparatus was as follows. The digester being partly filled with water, closed and placed on the fire, the generation of the steam would raise the oil or mercury in the bath E to the temperature of the water and steam within, so as to give to the thermometer F an indication of the temperature; and, at the same time, the elastic force of the steam flowing or moving by would raise it in C to a certain number of inches, so as to cause the corresponding pressure. This apparatus is both appropriate and ingenious, and indicates considerable mechanical knowledge in its inventor, a physician of

B

Fig. 8.

Wintrethour in Switzerland. Unhappily he lived too remote from the scene of the philosophical discoveries of that period, to adopt the precautions necessary to give value to his experiments. He allowed atmospheric air to mingle with the steam to such an extent as greatly to vitiate his results.

24. M. Betancourt visited England about the end of last century; and having been employed to select machines, models, and drawings for the Spanish government, made himself acquainted with the use of steam in Great

Britain at that period. On his return, he immediately

undertook a series of expe

riments on the force of the

vapour of water, alcohol, and

other liquids, at

temperatures.

various

His appara

tus is tolerably perfect; and the precautions which he adopted for the removal of atmospheric air from intermixture with the vapour, give his

Fig. 9.

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]

experiments considerable value and precision. Some of his experiments were made in vacuo; and he seems to

have been one of the first philosophers who examined the production of steam at temperatures below the ordinary point of ebullition, under the pressure of the atmosphere. His experiments extend from 32° up to 279°, being 67° above the ordinary boiling point.

His apparatus (fig. 9) consisted of a spheroidal copper boiler A, about eight inches in diameter, fifteen inches high, and a tenth of an inch in thickness; a flat cover was soldered on the top of it, and three apertures were formed into which were inserted a thermometer EC, a glass tube D, and a plug B, for admitting water. The glass tube being bent downwards at F, was recurved upwards at G, leaving an upright stem, ten feet high, and hermetically sealed at the top, so as to leave a perfect vacuum in that end of the tube, over a column of mercury of about 30 inches in the two branches of the recurvation at the bottom. The boiler was provided with a stop-cock b, by which the air was extracted from the boiler previous to experiment, by means of an air-pump TV, communicating with W ; and when this was accomplished so as to obtain a vacuum on both ends of the mercurial column, the mercury stood, as in the figure, on nearly the same level, in both its branches. The fire was instantly applied, and the crackling noise which followed informed him that the ebullition had commenced, and the steam in the boiler pressing on that end of the mercurial column nearest to it, raised the other in the vacuum a certain quantity above its outer level, indicating its elastic force, which gradually increased until it became at the usual heat of boiling water, equal to twentyeight French inches, the mean pressure of the atmosphere. The following table will enable us to estimate the value of these experiments; it is given in degrees of Reaumur's thermometer, of which 0° coincides with 32° of our com

mon scale, and 80° with our boiling point 212° Fahrenheit, each degree of Reaumur being equal to 24 of our scale. The is in French inches of mercury :—

pressure

[blocks in formation]

The slight deviation of these experiments from each other indicates considerable accuracy of experiment; and the slight excess in the former of the two series, is attributed to the formation of a less perfect vacuum at the commencement of the observations, arising from the smaller quantity of water in the boiler when the experiments were made.

It should, however, be noticed, that there is one omission of some importance in the experiments of M. Betan

« PrécédentContinuer »