Studies in Semitic GrammaticalizationBrill Academic Pub, 2005 - 177 pages This groundbreaking study examines the historical development of the Semitic languages from the point of view of grammaticalization, the linguistic process whereby lexical items and constructions lose their lexical meaning and serve grammatical functions. The author first provides an introduction to this process, followed by a comprehensive overview--with abundant examples from ancient and modern languages--of how it is exemplified in Semitic. Three successive chapters are devoted to in-depth studies of specific cases of grammaticalization: the definite article in Central Semitic, direct object markers across Semitic, and present tense prefixes in modern Arabic and Aramaic dialects. Drawing on evidence from many non-Semitic languages, from recent developments in the field of historical linguistics, and from traditional comparative Semitics, this book represents a major contribution to the field of comparative Semitics. |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-3 sur 34
Page 97
... marker a as a transla- tional device . The translator ( s ) of Targums Onqelos and Jonathan probably mim- icked the Hebrew in the same way . When Targums deviate from the underlying Hebrew , l- is the usual D.O. ... DIRECT OBJECT MARKERS 97.
... marker a as a transla- tional device . The translator ( s ) of Targums Onqelos and Jonathan probably mim- icked the Hebrew in the same way . When Targums deviate from the underlying Hebrew , l- is the usual D.O. ... DIRECT OBJECT MARKERS 97.
Page 107
... marks direct objects with the dative preposition— in this case , lil - though unlike in the dialects of Arabic discussed above , antici- patory object marking is not found . The object marker is obligatory when the object is a proper ...
... marks direct objects with the dative preposition— in this case , lil - though unlike in the dialects of Arabic discussed above , antici- patory object marking is not found . The object marker is obligatory when the object is a proper ...
Page 126
... Direct Object Markers In addition to the languages discussed above , some other Semitic languages pos- sess direct object markers . It seems appropriate that there should be some dis- cussion of these here , however brief . 5.6.1 The ...
... Direct Object Markers In addition to the languages discussed above , some other Semitic languages pos- sess direct object markers . It seems appropriate that there should be some dis- cussion of these here , however brief . 5.6.1 The ...
Table des matières
Classification of Semitic | 11 |
Grammaticalization in Semitic | 17 |
Definite Articles | 65 |
Droits d'auteur | |
4 autres sections non affichées
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
accusative accusativi Akkadian already Amharic animate appears Arabian Aramaic Aramaic dialects assume attested auxiliary base become Biblical Hebrew chapter Classical Arabic cognate common connection construction copula definite article demonstrative derives dialects direct object direct object marker discussion Egyptian English Ethiopic evidence example existential exists explained express fact final function further future Ge'ez German grammatical grammaticalization Hebrew historical Huehnergard independent indicate Jastrow king languages later Leslau linguistic mark meaning Moroccan namely NENA Neo-Aramaic nominal normally noted noun original parallel participle particle person Phoenician phrase plural possessive possible prefix preposition present tense pronominal suffix pronouns provides refer reflexive relative root seems Semitic Semitic languages similar simply situation stand suffixes suggests Syriac Targum tense marker theory third Tigrinya tion translation Tropper Turoyo verb verbal yāt Yemeni