Images de page

the doctrine of Election-Mr. How misrepresents and
abuses a clause in the Presbytian Confession of Faith
-Virtually vilifies an article of his own Church-Cer-
tain facts stated in the former volume, concerning Eng-

lish Episcopalians, denied-Proved to be true-Charge

of illiberality against the author-Refuted-The claim

of high-churchmen construed by impartial judges, and

even by Episcopal writers, as we construe it-Charge

against the author of departing from his own Confession

of Faith-Denied-Conclusion. p. 36-73.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

but a parochial Bishop-Recapitulation of testimony
from the Fathers. p. 148-216.


Testimony of the Reformers-Further proof that the
Waldenses were Presbyterians--Additional testimony
also that the Bohemian brethren embraced the doctrine
of ministerial parity-The attempts of Dr. Bowden and
Mr. How to show that the English Reformers were ben
hievers in the divine right of Prelacy, examined and
shown to be insufficient-Dr. Bowden represents the
first reformation in Scotland, under Knox, as prelatical
in its character-This representation shown to be an er◄
roneous one-Testimony of the Reformers on the conti-
nent of Europe-Luther-Augustan Confession-Des.
fence of the Augustan Confession-Smalkald Articles
Syllabus of controverted Points-Confession of Saxony

Confession of Witemberg-French Confession-Bel-
gic Confession--Second Helvetic ConfessionConfession
of Bohemia-Ursinus-Musculus-Szegedin Junius-
Sadeel-Crakenthorp-Further proof that the Churches
of Sweden and Denmark are not, and never were, Epis
copal, in Dr. Bowden's sense of the word-Recapitula-
tion. p. 217-277.


Testimony of Calvin-Extraordinary pains taken by
modern high-churchmen to abuse and blacken the charac-
ter of this Reformer Presbyterianism established in
Geneva before Calvin ever saw that city-This Refor-
mer alleged to have been, in the early part of his life,

favourable to Prelacy-Demonstration that this was not
the case-Particular quotations from Calvin's Institutes
and Commentary to show that he was a uniform believ-
er in the apostolic institution of Presbyterianism-Pas-
sages from Calvin's writings alleged to be favourable to
Prelacy, shown to be of a directly opposite character-
The assertion, that Calvin was never ordained, refuted

-The high honour in which he was held by Archbishop
Cranmer, and the other English Reformers-His influ
ence over those Reformers-The prevalence of his opin-
ions, at an early period, in the Church of England-
Testimonies in favour of Calvin by eminent Episcopal
writers-The personal character of Calvin vindicated-
His conduct in the cases of Castalio, Perrin, Gruet, Bol-
see, and Servetus, set in a true light—Dr. Bowden and
Mr. How throw out many reflections against Calvinism

In doing this, they oppose the thirty-nine Articles of
their own Church, and many of the most eminent Re-
formers of that Church, as well as the Scriptures-The.
difficulties of Calvinism-Still greater difficulties in Ar-
minianism-Consequences of rejecting the former, and
embracing the latter. p. 278-340.


Testimony of the Successors of the Reformers-Le
Blanc-Chamier Danau-Bochart-Claude-Daille


daus The Synod of Dort-Mr. How's astonishing
misconceptions and misrepresentations of that Synod
Its testimony shown to be strongly in favour of Presby-
terian parity Testimony of some distinguished members
of that Synod in their private capacity-Gomarus-

« PrécédentContinuer »